IELTS · Guide 22 · 10 min read
IELTS Speaking Part 3 sample answers: success and happiness
An IELTS Speaking Part 3 discussion on success and happiness, with transcripts at bands 8, 6.5 and 5 and commentary on all four criteria.
How to use this worked session
This page takes a Part 3 discussion on an abstract theme and shows three candidates answering it at different levels, as transcripts. Try it yourself first: read each question aloud, answer without notes, and record yourself. Aim for four to six sentences per answer. Then compare your recording with the transcripts and commentary.
The task
In Part 3 the examiner asks deeper questions linked to the Part 2 topic. It lasts 4 to 5 minutes. Here, the Part 2 card might have asked you to describe a person you consider successful.
Part 3 discussion questions: success and happiness
- How do people in your country usually measure success?
- Do you think money and happiness are closely connected?
- Why do some people who seem successful still feel unhappy?
- Should schools teach children how to be happy?
- Is social media changing the way people judge their own lives?
What the examiner is listening for
- Answers about people and society in general, not only your own life.
- A view, a reason and support: an example, a comparison or a consequence.
- Language for opinion, contrast and speculation: "I'd argue that", "up to a point", "it's likely that", "on the other hand".
Strong response (around band 8)
Examiner: How do people in your country usually measure success? Candidate: Traditionally, I'd say it's been measured in fairly concrete terms: a stable professional job, owning a home, and being able to support your family. Those things still matter enormously, particularly to my parents' generation. But I think younger people are starting to define it more broadly, so that having time for friends, or doing work you find meaningful, counts as success too, even if it pays less. Examiner: Do you think money and happiness are closely connected? Candidate: Up to a point, yes. If you're constantly worried about paying the rent, it's very hard to feel content, so having enough money clearly removes a major source of stress. Beyond that, though, I'm not convinced extra money makes much difference. Once people are comfortable, they tend to adjust their expectations, and what made them happy last year simply becomes normal. Examiner: Why do some people who seem successful still feel unhappy? Candidate: I think one reason is that success is often defined by other people. Someone might spend years working towards a promotion because it's what's expected of them, and then find it doesn't actually satisfy them. There's also the cost to consider. Reaching the top of a demanding profession can mean very long hours and less time with family, and that sacrifice can outweigh the rewards. Examiner: Should schools teach children how to be happy? Candidate: I'd be a bit cautious about the word "teach", because happiness isn't really a subject like maths. That said, there are skills that clearly contribute to well-being, such as managing stress, resolving arguments, or understanding the importance of sleep and exercise. If schools covered those in a practical way, rather than through lectures, I think it could make a real difference, especially for teenagers. Examiner: Is social media changing the way people judge their own lives? Candidate: Very much so, I'd say. People inevitably compare themselves with what they see, and what they see online is a carefully edited version of other people's lives: the holidays and celebrations, never the dull or difficult days. So it's easy to come away feeling your own life is falling short. On the other hand, it can also connect people with communities who share their interests, so it isn't entirely negative.
Commentary
- Fluency and Coherence: Each answer is well developed and moves logically from a view to reasons to a qualification. The candidate signals the shape of an argument naturally ("Up to a point, yes ... Beyond that, though", "That said", "On the other hand"). Answers are long enough to explore the idea but never wander.
- Lexical Resource: Precise language for abstract ideas: "concrete terms", "define it more broadly", "a major source of stress", "adjust their expectations", "outweigh the rewards", "well-being", "a carefully edited version", "falling short". The candidate even comments on the meaning of a word in the question ("cautious about the word 'teach'"), which shows real control.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Present perfect passive ("it's been measured"), conditionals ("If schools covered those ... it could make"), modals of possibility, gerund subjects ("Reaching the top ... can mean"), and relative clauses are used accurately and without effort.
- Pronunciation: This cannot be judged from a transcript. At this level, aim for intonation that shows the structure of an argument (a rise on "Up to a point" and a fall on the main claim), stress on contrasting words ("traditionally ... but younger people"), and a pace that is steady enough for complex ideas to be followed easily.
Pass-level response (around band 6.5)
Examiner: How do people in your country usually measure success? Candidate: In my country, I think most people measure success by money and job. For example, if someone is a doctor or an engineer and has a big house and a nice car, people think he is successful. Also, having a family is very important for success in my culture. Examiner: Do you think money and happiness are closely connected? Candidate: I think they are connected, but not completely. Money is necessary because you need it for food, housing and education for your children. But some rich people are not happy, and some poor people are very happy, so money is not everything. Examiner: Why do some people who seem successful still feel unhappy? Candidate: Maybe because they work too much and they don't have time for their family or hobbies. Also, some people achieve their goal but then they feel empty, because they don't know what to do next. I think it's important to have balance in life. Examiner: Should schools teach children how to be happy? Candidate: Yes, I think it would be useful. Schools focus a lot on exams and grades, and students feel a lot of pressure. If schools teach them how to deal with stress and how to be positive, they will be happier and maybe also study better. Examiner: Is social media changing the way people judge their own lives? Candidate: Yes, definitely. On social media people only post the good things, like holidays and expensive restaurants. So when other people see these pictures, they feel that their own life is boring. I think this is a big problem, especially for young people.
Commentary
- Fluency and Coherence: Every answer gives a view with at least one reason, and some include examples. The candidate speaks at a comfortable length. The ideas are sensible but stay quite general, and linking relies on "Also", "But" and "So".
- Lexical Resource: Adequate for the topic, with some useful phrases ("not completely", "feel empty", "deal with stress", "balance in life"). Abstract ideas are often expressed in simple terms ("money is not everything", "a big problem"), and there is little precise or less common vocabulary.
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: A fair range, including first conditionals and some complex sentences with "because" and "when". Errors are minor: "by money and job" needs "by money and jobs" or "by wealth and career", and "he" is used for people in general.
- Pronunciation: This cannot be judged from a transcript. To move higher, aim for intonation that signals your opinion ("Yes, definitely"), stress on the contrast in balanced answers ("some rich people are not happy, and some poor people are very happy"), and smooth linking across longer sentences.
What would lift it: add a qualification or an opposite view to at least some answers ("On the other hand ..."), and use more precise words for abstract ideas ("well-being", "pressure to succeed", "compare themselves with").
Weaker response (around band 5)
Examiner: How do people in your country usually measure success? Candidate: Er ... success is money. If you have money, you are success. And, er, good job. Examiner: Do you think money and happiness are closely connected? Candidate: Yes. Money is important. Without money you cannot ... er, you cannot do anything. So money make happy. Examiner: Why do some people who seem successful still feel unhappy? Candidate: Er ... I don't know. Maybe they are ... er, tired. Too much work. Examiner: Should schools teach children how to be happy? Candidate: Yes. School must teach. Because, er, students is stress. Too much exam. Examiner: Is social media changing the way people judge their own lives? Candidate: Yes. Social media is ... er, people see other people life and, er, they feel bad. Is not good.
Commentary
- Fluency and Coherence: The candidate responds to every question and sometimes gives a reason, but answers are very short and often in fragments. There is hesitation in almost every answer, and ideas are not developed or connected.
- Lexical Resource: The vocabulary is too limited for abstract topics. Key ideas are expressed with basic words ("money", "tired", "bad"), and word forms are confused ("you are success" for "you are successful", "students is stress" for "students are stressed").
- Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Mainly short, simple structures, with one basic conditional. Frequent errors: subject-verb agreement ("money make", "students is"), missing subjects ("Is not good"), missing plurals ("Too much exam") and missing possessives ("other people life").
- Pronunciation: This cannot be judged from a transcript. A speaker at this level should aim to finish each word clearly, especially endings such as "-ful", "-ed" and "-s", keep going through a sentence instead of stopping before key words, and stress the main idea so that short answers still sound purposeful.
What would lift it: for every Part 3 question, use a simple frame: "I think ... because ... For example, ... So ...". Learn the word families you need for common themes (success, successful, succeed; stress, stressed, stressful).
The three answers side by side
| Feature | Band 8 | Band 6.5 | Band 5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Development | View, reasons, qualification | View and a reason, some examples | Short fragments |
| Abstract vocabulary | Precise and varied | Adequate, often simple | Very limited, wrong word forms |
| Balance | Weighs both sides | Occasional contrast | Rarely |
| Grammar | Wide range, accurate | Some complex sentences, minor errors | Simple, frequent errors |
Self-check checklist
- Did I answer about people and society in general, not only about myself?
- Did each answer have a view, a reason and an example or consequence?
- Did I show some balance, such as "up to a point" or "on the other hand"?
- Were my answers four to six sentences, not one or two?
- Did I use the right word forms (success, successful, succeed)?
- Did I use conditionals or speculation ("If schools did ..., it might ...")?
- Did I avoid repeating the same simple words ("good", "bad", "important")?
- In my recording, does my intonation make my opinion clear?
About the band levels
The band levels on this page are our own estimates for practice purposes. They are not official scores and are not produced or endorsed by any IELTS partner. Only a certified examiner assessing a real test can give you an official band.